Built for the groups that share research data.
A single lab, a multi-site consortium and an institute with many programs all need the same guarantee: every result traces back to the data behind it. What differs is who has to agree on what.
Keep your own data reproducible.
For a principal investigator and a small team who want their analyses to survive the next grad student.
Harmonize data across sites.
For multi-site studies that must measure the same things the same way and release on a schedule.
Run many programs on one governed platform.
For an institute that has to keep programs separate, keep data in its own account, and answer a security review.
What this looks like in practice.
Illustrative scenarios, not customer stories.
Depression screening across three sites
Each site uploads PHQ-9 data to its own collection. A curator approves the shared structure, a permission group unlocks cross-site queries, and release-3 is published with its snapshot recorded.
Re-running a published analysis
Two years after publication, a reviewer opens the finding, sees the release and snapshot it used, and re-runs the notebook. The result matches, although the live table has since grown.
Variant calling on a curated pipeline
An owner launches nf-core sarek from a collection, sees the maximum cost before launch, and gets the outputs back as files in the same collection, with VCFs opening in the genome viewer.
Tell us who needs to agree.
We will map your groups, data and review process onto the platform.